My topic was
Melungeons and other tri-racial isolate groups.
I always searched for “Melungeon” first and then attempted to find
information on any/all of the other groups if nothing was found with that
initial search. The topic was not
well-covered at all in some of the databases.
For instance, PsychInfo, PubMed and American Fact Finder had virtually
nothing on the subject. Others such as
ProQuest DIALOG, LexisNexis, Google Images, WorldCat and JSTOR did have some
really good results.
I didn’t get the
opportunity to do a lot of “strategic changes” to my searching. If the database had any results on my subject
at all, I retrieved them with a simple search and, in most cases, narrowing it
down at all just led to getting no results.
In a couple instances, I did add the limiter “Appalachia” and was still
able to get some hits. I did have it
re-emphasized over and over how very different a results list can be when the
search term is pluralized.
*In the 1997 newspaper article "The Mysterious Melungeons: The Descendants of a Forgotten Appalachian People Seek The Truth About Their Ancestry" by Ralph Berrier, Jr. in The Roanoke Times: "Melungeons had a bad reputation in the late 1800s and early 1900s. They were seen by some as wild mountain people who raided the lowlands and made counterfeit coins or moonshine. Though the outlaw label is exaggerated, some of it can be traced to the years after the Civil War, when roving bands of Melungeons allegedly wreaked vengeance on people who had earlier persecuted them."
*Melungeons were sometimes referred to as “ramps” after the wild-onion type plant of the same name that grows in Appalachia in the spring
*I
also saw mention of a tri-racial isolate group I was not formerly familiar
with: the Turks of South Carolina.